Enter your email address to receive new posts in your inbox:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Like what you see? Share!

Monthly Archive

DISCLAIMER: This blog is published for general information only - it is not intended to constitute legal advice and cannot be relied upon by any person as legal advice. While we welcome you to contact our authors, the submission of a comment or question does not create an attorney-client relationship between the Firm and you.

« Net-metering News from Maine and California | Main | Pipeline Appeals Grant of Summary Judgment to South Portland Regarding Its Ban on Marine Loading of Crude Oil »

Supreme Court Says “No Frog Habitat, No Critical Habitat”

You might assume that if an endangered species is nowhere to be found on your property, you can rest easy.  “No,” said the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which decided in 2012 that if your land might be a good place for the Dusky Gopher frog to live, you might be subject to development restrictions under the Federal Endangered Species Act.

Weyerhaeuser sued, claiming that USFWS’s decision about what constitutes “critical habitat” was too broad.  The U.S. Supreme Court agreed, and further held that because Weyerhaeuser’s land needed work to host this endangered frog (the planting of lots of new pine trees), USFWS should have considered those costs before concluding that this private land was endangered-frog-ready.

So…we needed the US Supreme Court to tell us that land bereft of the frog, that needed work before it could host the frog, cannot be considered frog “critical habitat”???  Apparently, yes.

If you have questions regarding development restrictions under the Federal Endangered Species Act contact Scott Anderson or another member of Verrill Dana’s Environmental Group.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend