Search
Twitter

DISCLAIMER: This blog is published for general information only - it is not intended to constitute legal advice and cannot be relied upon by any person as legal advice. U.S. Treasury Regulations require us to notify you that any tax-related material in this blog (including links and attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties, and may not be referred to in any marketing or promotional materials.  While we welcome you to contact our authors, the submission of a comment or question does not create an attorney-client relationship between the Firm and you.

« Energy News Roundup: July 3-July 9 | Main | Energy News Roundup: June 26-July 2 »
Wednesday
Jul072010

Northwestern Mass. Wind Project May Move Forward, Rules SJC

In a decision issued yesterday, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court upheld a state agency’s approval for a wind developer to build two access roads that will allow for the construction and maintenance of a wind project in northwestern Massachusetts.

New England Wind, LLC will be able to commence construction on the two gravel access roads, with some conditions.  The developer must retain a compliance monitor and a wetlands scientist who will oversee the construction of the roads.  New England Wind must also submit reports on storm water management and the ecological status of any resource areas at issue.

The dispute began when New England Wind filed a notice of intent to construct the roads with a town conservation commission.  The commission approved the request to build the roads, which would cross several intermittent streams.  Following the approval, a Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection magistrate heard a citizens’ group’s arguments that the access roads would impair the stability of the stream banks.  In a recommended decision, the magistrate sided with the citizens’ group.

In the DEP’s final decision, a commissioner rejected the magistrate’s ruling and approved the road project.  The commissioner ruled that the magistrate incorrectly found that the road projects would affect the stream banks, where the developer’s plans included culverts that would keep the roads from affecting the banks.  This error led to the magistrate using the wrong legal standard in analyzing the question. 

The SJC affirmed the DEP’s final decision in full.  The case is Ten Local Citizen Group v. New England Wind, LLC, SJC-10585.  The project is owned by Iberdrola Renewables. 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>